The Council of Jerusalem & the Ruling for the Former-Gentiles

The Council of Jerusalem & the Ruling for the Former-Gentiles
Dr. Don Meecha

The Newer Covenant[1] was, at first, a local Israeli/Judean/Galilee phenomena which eventually spread into the surrounding districts of Samaria[2] and then into the territories of the Gentiles[3].  By the time of Acts 10, the Ruach HaKodesh, or the Holy Spirit fell on Cornelius and his household bringing a serious historical Jewish religious issue to the forefront of this new Messianic Jewish movement.  The question finally to be dealt with was, “What are we (Jews) going to do with the Gentiles?”  The first assembly was forced to deal with the problem because there were many Gentiles who now said they believed in Yeshua, the Jewish Messiah and they wanted to join the Jews in fellowship.  The Apostles were wrestling with the commandments and the traditions attempting to answer this question.  The Gentiles may or may not know the basics of the Word of God!  If they did, how much should they know and keep?  If they knew little or nothing could they even fellowship with the Apostles?  As the issue mounted, it was necessary to deal with it through what has become known as the “Jerusalem Council.”  In Acts 15, this council is convened to settle once and for all on, “How to deal with and have fellowship with the newly Spirit-filled former-Gentiles.”[4]  

The Jerusalem Council consisted of Peter, James, John and a myriad others who formed the plurality of Elders, or the leadership of this new Messianic community.  Its headquarters was at Jerusalem and from there they led and served the growing Messianic and former-Gentile assembly.  This went on for decades until the Jewish Wars with Rome (66 -70 C.E.) and the destruction of the Temple. 

If certain facts of this event are overlooked it can lead to a diminishing of its importance.  Therefore, one must not overlook: the venue for this Council, those who attended, the purpose and most importantly the Apostolic Ruling in reference to the criteria former-Gentiles are to follow.  The Council met in Jerusalem, Israel with the upper-most level of Apostolic Authority.  The purpose was to resolve what it would take to have fellowship between Jews and former-Gentiles as Spirit filled individuals and as part of God’s people.[5]  By not solving this dilemma the Apostles would surely bring serious injury to the new assembly and eventually, if they continued, these troubles could cause the complete destruction of this fledgling movement of God.[6]  In order to keep the Good News spreading into the world of the Gentiles, God literally forced the Apostles to create a “path of approach” for these new “former-Gentile” believers.  This path of approach would allow the new believers to follow some simple commands, at a minimum, as they grew in their new faith while being discipled and taught all that Yeshua commanded.[7]

The apostles wanted to have unity and fellowship, but it was necessary that these former-Gentiles understood God and the Bible, which held His commands concerning how to live a godly life.  These new believers may have known of the commands of the rabbis but many more knew very little of Biblical Judaism.  Now this new Messianic Jewish Community was forced to solve an issue even Rabbinic Judaism has not really solved.   This problem continues to this day.  The assembly of Messiah was being transformed again with the Gentile issue just as it had been in fluctuation when a great many of the priest who served in the Temple became believers.[8]  And now, in the midst of pain and growth the Apostolic Decree of the Jerusalem Council from Acts 15:20 summarizes the result of the meeting.  This inspired list of requirements seemed good to the Holy Spirit and the Apostles[9] so Gentiles could fit into the people of God and the Commonwealth of Israel.[10]

The council needed to systematize and codify the content of the teaching and the commands necessary for “former-Gentiles” to follow if they were to be a unified community.  While it is apparent that some Jewish believers were teaching that gentile believers had to be circumcised as part of the salvation process or they couldn’t be saved, we see that the Apostles knew that uncircumcised people had been given the Holy Spirit and had been immersed by His Spirit alone and baptized into the Body.[11]  No one could deny that God had called gentiles to repentance and salvation, but a formal policy about food commands and circumcision had not yet been made, nor had any guidelines been created to deal with the issue.

Many Gentiles had come into the assembly due to the labor of Sha’ul (Paul) and Barnabas[12] and it was apparent that these former-Gentiles would become a growing dominate force in the future. Therefore, they had to lay out some basic guide lines necessary to clarify the basic practice and theology for this new group. What we see emphasized at the Jerusalem Council is that those who purported that Gentile believers must be circumcised and obey all the Law of Moses to be saved were not victorious, as the decree clearly states that circumcision was not necessary as out-lined by the Spirit of God, nor obeying all of the Law of Moses as a pre-requisite to salvation.

Peter reminds the group of the precedent set by God in the household of Cornelius and that He alone is the One Who chose the Gentiles to hear the message of salvation and believe.  This was done first through Peter’s own preaching[13] and God did not discriminate; He treated Jew and Gentile alike.[14]  Peter had experienced the entrance of the Gentiles earlier in the Book of Acts while he had stayed in Joffa:

On the next day, as they were on their way and approaching the city, Peter went up on the housetop about the sixth hour to pray. But he became hungry and was desiring to eat; but while they were making preparations, he fell into a trance and he saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground and there were in it all kinds of four-footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air. A voice came to him, “Get up, Peter, kill and eat!” But Peter said, “By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything unholy and unclean.” Again a voice came to him a second time, “What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy.” This happened three times, and immediately the object was taken up into the sky. Now while Peter was greatly perplexed in mind as to what the vision which he had seen might be…                                                                                                                                Acts 10:9-17a

It was only by the means of this vision, which at first perplexed Peter; he had no clue prior to the vision that God wanted the Gentiles to received the Ruach/Spirit and be entered into the community of believers.  By the time Peter gets to the home of Cornelius he had figured out the meaning of the vision from God:

And Peter said to them, “You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit him and yet God has shown me that I should not call any man unholy or unclean!”                                                                             Acts 10:28

Yes, Peter figured out that the vision was about men and not food.  The main issue for Jews was that the Gentiles had contact with many “unclean” things and most had no Biblical definition of what God defines as food.  These eating habits had kept the Jews from fellowshipping with the Gentiles and yet, God allowed Peter to come to terms with that the vision of the unclean animals represented men eating unclean food, not unclean food.  These former-Gentiles were cleansed by faith and that God would purify their hearts.  God would make them clean and He had made the disciples of clean.[15]

After Peter’s involvement with Cornelius there was criticism from within the Jewish contingency in Jerusalem[16], but remember it was not all focused on what must be done to keep our salvation, but rather on how do Jews and former-Gentiles were to fellowship with the food issue and the issue of circumcision.  Rabbinic Judaism forbids certain forms of association with Gentiles due to the issue of purity and the food issue is the main issue always has been the issue and always will be the issue, but the issue of circumcision runs a close second.  In Peter’s vision purity was a major concern. He tells the Council at Jerusalem that God made the Gentile clean and acceptable to Him even in their uncircumcised state.  He condemned the advocates of circumcision by putting forth the question, “Why do you put God to the test?”[1]  If the former-Gentile believers are acceptable to God in an uncircumcised state, they ought to be acceptable to Jewish believers in an uncircumcised state. But, they were about to lay 4 commands on these former-Gentiles as basic requirements for fellowship.

Today, Christianity views Acts 15 and its 4 basic requirements as a yoke and burden.  Anything to do with a commandment of God becomes a derogatory phrase.  The Apostles were not criticizing the Torah or Moses; they spoke of an obligation to which one should gladly commit himself.  Peter said that the Torah is not an effective means of gaining acceptance with God and the Jews knew it was a yoke they struggled with did not say that Law-keeping saved anyone.  They said Jews are saved by grace and faith just as the Gentiles.

The Jerusalem Council’s Decree stated that Gentiles did not need to be circumcised and they did not have to become Jews first by becoming proselytes. The Apostolic Assembly accepted this in silence and in agreement. James then steps forward and states that God has initiated the taking of a new people out of the Gentiles, a people for His Name,[17] just as God was taking Jews and since both gentiles and Jews are saved in the same way, the implication is that they are the same people of God. Nevertheless, he believed that Gentiles could be saved without circumcision.  Therefore, James said, “We should not put obstacles in the way of the gentiles who are turning to God.”[18]

James tells the Council that the former-Gentiles must abstain from four things.  These four prohibitions/restrictions were and are the minimum required.  They were considered easy enough for them to comply and, we can not be so sure that the Gentiles were not entirely unaware of the prohibitions prior to this decree.  These commands do not rise out of a vacuum and they are not viewed by the Apostles as a burden.[19]  There is also no doubt that many of these former-Gentiles were sufficiently ready to conform to Jewish practices in order to make possible normal social contact, including friendship and eating in fellowship.

The Jerusalem Council’s decree was addressed only to the former-Gentiles,[20] since these four requirements were not designated for Jewish believers, as they kept a stricter code.[21] These four requirements were necessary, but not burdensome.[22] The decree was not a heavy-handed demand for obedience as they considered these former-Gentiles would learn as they grew.[23]  They makes no reference to salvation it is accepted and there is no mention of penalties for any infraction. Rather, the letter ends with the mild words: “You will do well to avoid these things.”[24]

Today, the decree of the Jerusalem Council is not emphasized within Christianity and yet it is the most important judgment made by the early apostolic assembly and the Ruach HaKodesh.  Its judgment has been all but lost.  The decree is clear, concise and incontestable.  Yet, in the face of numerous and comprehensive arguments, sermons, papers and books the Jerusalem Council’s Decree, inspired directly by the Ruach HaKodesh, the Holy Spirit, remains unheeded and sadly, even mentioning it is divisive.  Why would “Spirit-filled” individuals reject a “Spirit-filled” set of minimum requirements or, commands?  To this, there is no acceptable answer. 

If we concentrate on the context and the purpose of the Jerusalem Decree, as contained in Acts 15, we can deduct the following:

·       The decree was not written as a formula for salvation, or to keep salvation

·       Former-Gentiles were already born-again and part of the people of God

·       Four requirements were advised by the Spirit of God and written by the Apostles

·       The Apostles had/have the authority to bind individuals/peoples to decrees

·       The council did not use the Rabbinic or the Pharisaic commands

·       The council appealed to the sign of creation (the Shabbat), Biblical commands given to Noah[25] and commands from the Torah given to Moses,[26] outlining the definition of food[2] for man and how to live an undefiled life

·       Four requirements were given to be the basics for former-Gentiles who were strangers/aliens to the Biblical community and in need of guidance

·       Acts 15:21 implies the decree given was in cooperation with synagogue preaching “because Moses is taught every Shabbat”

·       The four prohibitions were to help former-Gentiles overcome idolatrous practices

·       The Decree simply lists what former-Gentiles should avoid, that it “…be well for them.”

What are the Prohibitions outlined by the Apostolic Council for former-Gentiles? They are to:

1.     Abstain from things sacrificed to idols

2.     Abstain from blood

3.     Abstain from things strangled

4.     Abstain from fornication

The background for these commands can be found in the Mosaic Covenant, yet they are eternal and can be discovered in Genesis prior to the giving of the Torah.  Of these commands three of them deal with the Kashrut/Food Commands and one is of a sexual nature.  The one sexual prohibition is easy to understand, it would be pollution and defilement to the body, corruption.  So, why are there three food commands?  Most former-Gentiles, today, fail to recognize that the Temple system and the Alter of sacrifice is a place where “food” for God is prepared as an offering from His people:

You are presenting defiled food upon My altar But you say, “How have we defiled You? In that you say, the table of the LORD is to be despised.”                                      Malachi 1:7

Believers, then and today are reminded that God’s alter is His table before them that believers set in His presence.  Believers are to be holy to God, both the Jew and the former-Gentile.  Romans 12:1-2 clearly states that each one is to be a holy and living sacrifice before God, offering up sacrifices that are acceptable, not defiled.  One is to renew their mind with the Word of God and not be conformed to this world, in old ways.  The Mosaic Covenant and the Law, the Torah, were given to man that he might know what God wants from him in a covenant relationship,[27] how we are to treat our neighbors and how we are to conduct ourselves.  Therefore, for the former-Gentiles, the Council’s ruling was an official edict and James’ statement, “Therefore I judge[28]…,” means James had the highest position of authority and the final word in the Assembly overall.  In the Greek text, James’ words come across even stronger and in addition, his decision was written in a letter and it was presented as the mutual decision of all present.[29]  Beyond the shadow of a doubt this judgment was supported by all present. But, what did James really decide?  When he said, “We should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God…,” and in effect he said, “Let them do these basic things as they are turning to God, and we should not trouble them.”   Why, not trouble them?  Because as he said earlier in Acts 15:20: “For Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath.” 

This meaning, that if they the former-Gentiles do this, they will also be learning in the synagogue as they worship on the Shabbat and James had decided that Peter, Barnabas, and Sha’ul were correct and that the Pharisees who believed were wrong about the issue of Gentile circumcision and the necessity for them to keep all of Torah.  But, what he did write in the Decree was that the former-Gentiles: 

  1. Abstain from things polluted by idols
  2. Abstain from sexual immorality
  3. Abstain from things strangled
  4. Abstain from blood
 The decision of the Jerusalem Council was that the former-Gentile believers should not be under the burden of the Mosaic Law, but it is tempered by practical instruction.  The verdict was that it was important for these new believers not act in a way that would bring shame to God’s Word or, antagonize the Jewish Community in every city and destroy the Assembly’s witness among both Jews and Gentiles.  In essence the judgment stated that Gentile Christians did not have the “right” to: 
  1. Eat meat sacrificed to idols, because those animals which were in the pagan markets had been offered to the local god(s) and not slaughtered according to Biblical prescription.  Many markets in the Roman-Greco world included a temple to a pagan god; many were to the god Cerus, the god of grain.  Others were to local gods and goddesses, or the major regional deity and later to the Roman emperors themselves depicted as gods.  Also, much of the meat sacrificed was not according to the Biblical definition of food[30] and many sacrifices were of pigs and other animals not considered Biblically edible.
  2. Continue in fornication and the sexual practices of the local pagan community by participating in the temple cults and carousing through the prostitutes.  Also, marriage practices were extremely permissible, promiscuous and some very obscure.  Therefore, it must be remembered that homosexuality and sexual interaction with male and female prostitutes ran amuck and at times was expected behavior.
  3. Eat things strangled; pagan temples had many strange practices in their sacrificial systems before the gods and animals were at times tortured, strangled, etc.  The butchers and those who worked in the slaughtering industry were not aware of Biblical commands concerning blood and the proper draining of it from the animal’s body.  This in essence could lead to serious health issues if the blood was not drained properly.
  4. Eat blood or food without a kosher bleeding because these aspects of the Mosaic Law kept the people safe from sickness, disease and other things that could cause serious damage to the health of the believing community.  However, the Council refrained from inflammatory language and encouraged the former-Gentiles to lay down their former eating practices and come n line with God’s definition of food as found in the Torah. 

All four of these commands are related to the sexual and the dietary commands found in Leviticus, chapters 11, 17 and 18.  The majority of them are entirely concerned with dietary matters, which if not followed would cause personal Biblical defilement and therefore, inhibit Jewish-Gentile relations and common fellowship meals.”[31]  However, it must again be noted that these commands were Spirit-filled and binding with the promise of a blessing that things would be well for those who kept “these things.”

 

In conclusion, it seemed good to the Ruach HaKodesh, the Holy Spirit in the days of the first assembly that these things be so, and more than likely, it still seems good to Him today.  Why?  Because Yeshua is the same yesterday, today and forever[32] and therefore, it would be good for former-Gentiles to review these things and consider what God wants them to do with them.  If God is calling you into a deeper relationship with Him, this is a good place to start.



[1] The Newer Covenant begins with the coming of the Ruach on Shavuot/Pentecost fifty days after Yeshua’s resurrection and ten day s after His Ascension to heaven.  The story line of Acts 2:1-41 through to Acts 15 reveals a small, fairly close-knit, Newer Covenant Messianic Community, which was spreading into the outlying Samaritan and Gentile communities.  Although there were Jews from all over the world at the first Shavuot, who returned home and took their faith in the Messiah back with them, we know nothing about them and we only see the development from within Israel proper prior to the thirteenth chapter and the issue at Antioch concluding with the Jerusalem Decree in chapter fifteen.

[2] Acts 8:5

[3] Acts 9:1-6, Please see the dispute which arose in the assembly in Galatia concerning Sha’ul, Peter, Barnabas, those messengers from the camp of James and the former-Gentiles concerning Jews and Gentiles eating together, Galatians 2:11-14.

[4] I prefer to use the designation that Sha’ul used in reference to those Gentiles who are now believers, “former-Gentiles.” He uses the phrase, “…formerly you the Gentiles in the flesh…” in Ephesians 2:12 to outline for those individuals the blessings they now received because of being “in Yeshua.” To the Jews a Gentile was a heathen; but now, these individuals are no longer heathens and therefore as “former-Gentiles” they are equal citizens in the family of God.

[5] Ephesians 2:15, “[Yeshua] by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might make the two into one new man, thus establishing peace…”

[6] Acts 5:34-39, “A Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the Law, respected by all the people, stood up in the Council and gave orders to put the men outside for a short time and he said to them, “Men of Israel, take care what you propose to do with these men. For some time ago Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody, and a group of about four hundred men joined up with him. But he was killed, and all who followed him were dispersed and came to nothing. After this man, Judas of Galilee rose up in the days of the census and drew away some people after him; he too perished, and all those who followed him were scattered. So in the present case, I say to you, stay away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or action is of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even be found fighting against God.”

[7] Matthew 28:19-20 discloses Yeshua’s command is as follows: 1. Make disciples 2. Immerse them (mikvah, complete immersion) 3. “Then teach them all that I commanded you.”  This is the opposite of what the rabbis teach even to this day, as the model in the Jewish community for conversion is: 1. be taught all of the commands and keep them 2. Immerse the individual in the name of the denomination, or rabbi 3. Then Make them a disciple.

[8] Acts 6:7

[9] Acts 15:28-29

[10] Ephesians 2:12; “Remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.”

[11] Acts 10:44-48

[12] Please read Acts 13-14 for the early work of Sha’ul & Barnabas among the Gentiles.

[13] Acts 15:7

[15] Sha’ul states in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Yeshua the Messiah and in the Ruach of our God.

[16] Please see the upheaval in Galatia and Sha’ul’s comments

[17] Acts 15:14

[18] Acts 15:19

[19] Acts 15:10-11

[20] Acts 15:23

[21] In Acts 21:20, James gives a clear definition of a Messianic Jew when he states to Sha’ul, “You see, brother, how many thousands there are among the Jews of those who have believed, and they are all zealous for the Law…”  This coincides with the continuing definition given in the last book of the Newer Covenant for Messianic Jews in the last days from Revelation 12:17 – “So the dragon [Satan] was enraged with the woman [Israel] and went off to make war with the rest of her children, who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Yeshua.”

[22] Acts 15:28

[23] Matthew 18:18-20 & Luke 10:19, “I have given you all authority…” Yeshua, clearly in the context of this passage, is speaking first and foremost to the apostles, His chosen, the very first receivers of His authority and the power they wielded in the establishment of the first assembly can not really be challenged.

[23] Acts 15:21 – “For Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath,” it would be extremely hard to conceive that the Apostles thought of anything other than communal gatherings on the Shabbat and that the synagogue was the place to learn more each week.  Any other reading does not fit the context.

[24] Acts 15:29

[25] Genesis 9:1-17

[26] The commands given from Exodus 20 and following through Leviticus and their reiteration in the Book of Deuteronomy.

[27] Deuteronomy 29:29, “The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law.”

[28] Acts 15:19

[29] Acts 15:25, “It seemed good to us…”

[30] Please read Leviticus 11.

[31] Stott, Acts of the Apostles, chapter 15.

[32] Hebrews 13:8